Do they own your data? Gong Privacy Policy Reviewed.

Gong receives a 6/10 enterprise readiness score, marking it as partially ready for large-scale B2B deployments. While strong in conversation intelligence and sales insights, gaps in advanced security controls and enterprise governance limit its appeal to Fortune 500 companies.

audio-thumbnail
Listen to this review
0:00
/0

Final Enterprise Readiness Rating: 6/10

⚠️ Partially ready (Reviewed 2026).

Area

Verdict

Notes

Data Residency & Storage

✅  Good

Good geographic coverage with adequate legal frameworks for data transfers

AI Model Use

❌  High Risk

Policy mentions AI/ML capabilities but provides no details on external models, training data usage, or customer control options

Data Minimization

⚠️  Partial

Collects extensive data including call recordings, transcriptions, device info, and behavioral analytics with business rationale but limited minimization options

Privacy Controls

⚠️  Partial

Provides some granular controls like voice identification opt-in but relies on legitimate interest for many processing activities

Compliance & Auditability

⚠️  Partial

Excellent GDPR compliance and DPF certification but no mention of SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA compliance

Consent Handling

⚠️  Partial

Places consent responsibility on customers rather than providing built-in consent workflows

Model Explainability

❌  High Risk

No mention of AI decision logging, model explainability, or transparency into AI processing

Data Retention & Deletion

⚠️  Partial

Provides general retention principles and deletion rights but lacks specific timelines or configurable retention policies

Third-Party Sharing

⚠️  Partial

Shares data with numerous service providers and partners but provides opt-out mechanisms and doesn't sell personal data


⚠️ Recommendation for Enterprises:

Adopt Gong with caution. Be especially careful if you handle:

  • HIPAA-regulated health data
  • Highly confidential legal communications
  • Classified or export-controlled information

Instead, consider AI tools that:

  • Provide SOC 2 Type II certification
  • Offer transparent AI model usage controls
  • Allow customer-configurable retention policies
  • Provide built-in consent management workflows

Better Alternative:

BuildBetter.ai — GDPR, SOC 2 Type 2, and HIPAA compliant

Zero training on customer data

You own your data. Fully opt-in privacy model.

🔍  Gong Privacy Policy – Enterprise Risk Assessment

Audience: Security-conscious enterprise organizations evaluating AI-powered revenue intelligence platform for sales call recording and analysis for internal use in highly sensitive or regulated environments (e.g. legal, healthcare, finance, tech/IP-heavy orgs).


⚠️ Where Gong Falls Short – Critical Gaps


🔒  1. Data Residency & Storage

Quote: "We and our authorized Service Providers maintain, store and process personal data in the United States of America, Europe, Israel, and other locations... Gong.io Inc. complies with the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF), the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework"

Risk: Multi-region storage with proper transfer mechanisms reduces compliance risk for global enterprises, though 'other locations' is vague

Enterprise Issue:

  • No guarantee of specific region-only storage
  • Vague 'other locations' language
  • No mention of VPC or private cloud options

Verdict:Strong international compliance framework


🧠  2. AI Model Use

Quote: "so we can continue improving our products, offerings and the overall performance of our Services, including through the utilization and optimization of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning capabilities"

Risk: For enterprises handling sensitive data, not knowing if conversations are used to train external AI models or which third-party AI services are used creates unacceptable risk

Enterprise Issue:

  • No disclosure of external AI model providers
  • No opt-out for AI model training
  • No bring-your-own-model options mentioned

Verdict:Zero transparency on AI model sourcing and training


📊  3. Data Minimization

Quote: "connectivity, technical and aggregated usage data, such as user agent, IP addresses and approximate location based upon such IP addresses, device data, activity logs, session recordings, log-in credentials to the Services, the cookies and pixels installed or utilized on their device"

Risk: Extensive data collection necessary for service functionality but creates large attack surface and compliance burden for sensitive enterprises

Enterprise Issue:

  • Very broad data collection scope
  • Limited customer control over data collection
  • Session recordings and behavioral tracking by default

Verdict: ⚠️ Broad data collection with business justification


⚙️  4. Privacy Controls

Quote: "Where a Customer has enabled the optional 'voice identification' feature within the Platform, and their User(s) then specifically opt-in and consent to the activation of this feature... You can manage your cookie preferences through the 'Your Privacy Choices' link"

Risk: While some features require explicit consent, core analytics and improvement activities rely on legitimate interest, giving enterprises limited control

Enterprise Issue:

  • Core features rely on legitimate interest vs consent
  • Limited workspace-level privacy controls
  • Cookie controls don't cover all data processing

Verdict: ⚠️ Mixed opt-in/opt-out with some granular controls


📦  5. Compliance & Auditability

Quote: "Gong.io Inc. has certified to the U.S. Department of Commerce that it adheres to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework Principles... Standard Contractual Clauses as approved by the European Commission"

Risk: Missing SOC 2 Type II and other enterprise security certifications makes this risky for regulated industries despite good privacy compliance

Enterprise Issue:

  • No SOC 2 Type II certification mentioned
  • No ISO 27001 compliance disclosed
  • No HIPAA compliance for healthcare enterprises

Verdict: ⚠️ Strong GDPR framework but missing key enterprise certifications


Quote: "Our Customers are solely responsible for determining whether and how they wish to use our Platform, and for ensuring that all individuals... have been provided with adequate notice and given informed consent"

Risk: This shifts legal liability to customers but doesn't provide the tools to properly manage consent at scale, creating compliance gaps

Enterprise Issue:

  • No built-in consent automation
  • Customer bears full legal liability
  • Limited guidance on consent requirements

Verdict: ⚠️ Customer responsible for consent collection


🔍  7. Model Explainability

Risk: For enterprises needing to audit AI decisions or explain outcomes to regulators/clients, the complete lack of AI transparency is unacceptable

Enterprise Issue:

  • No AI decision audit trails
  • No model explainability features
  • No transparency into AI processing logic

Verdict:No AI transparency or explainability provisions


🧼  8. Data Retention & Deletion

Quote: "We retain personal data for as long as we deem it as reasonably necessary in order to maintain and expand our relationship and provide you with our Services... to request rectification or erasure of your personal data"

Risk: Vague 'as long as reasonably necessary' standard doesn't meet enterprise needs for predictable, configurable retention policies

Enterprise Issue:

  • No specific retention timelines
  • Limited customer control over retention periods
  • Subjective 'reasonably necessary' standard

Verdict: ⚠️ Vague retention with deletion rights


🤝  9. Third-Party Sharing

Quote: "We engage selected third-party companies and individuals to perform services on our behalf... Our Service Providers may have access to personal information, depending on each of their specific roles and purposes... We do so in pursuit of the business and commercial purposes described in Section 2 above"

Risk: Large third-party ecosystem increases risk surface but business necessity justifies most sharing; cookie-based sharing can be controlled

Enterprise Issue:

  • Extensive third-party service provider ecosystem
  • Partner data sharing for business development
  • Cookie-based data sharing with advertisers

Verdict: ⚠️ Extensive third-party ecosystem with some controls


✅ What Gong Does Right (Credit Where It's Due)

  • Excellent GDPR compliance and data transfer frameworks
  • Strong geographic coverage with proper legal mechanisms
  • Clear data controller/processor role definitions
  • Transparent third-party sharing disclosures
  • Robust individual rights implementation

Disclaimer: This evaluation is based solely on publicly available information and documentation. For formal enterprise vetting, always request a vendor's latest DPA, security whitepaper, and third-party audit reports.