Do they own your data? MeetGeek Privacy Policy Reviewed.

Listen to this review

0:00

/0

1×

Final Enterprise Readiness Rating: 6/10

⚠️ Partially ready (Reviewed 2026).

⚠️ Recommendation for Enterprises:

Adopt MeetGeek with caution. Be especially careful if you handle:

• Healthcare data requiring HIPAA compliance
• Financial services data
• Legal client communications
• Highly regulated industry data

Instead, consider AI tools that:

• Obtain SOC 2 Type II certification
• Provide detailed AI processing transparency
• Offer enterprise admin controls and consent automation
• Clarify data retention policies and provide configuration options

Better Alternative:

✅ BuildBetter.ai — GDPR, SOC 2 Type 2, and HIPAA compliant

✅ Zero training on customer data

✅ You own your data. Fully opt-in privacy model.

🔍  MeetGeek Privacy Policy – Enterprise Risk Assessment

Audience: Security-conscious enterprise organizations evaluating AI meeting assistant for automatic recording and transcription for internal use in highly sensitive or regulated environments (e.g. legal, healthcare, finance, tech/IP-heavy orgs).

⚠️ Where MeetGeek Falls Short – Critical Gaps

🔒  1. Data Residency & Storage

Quote: "The hosting facilities for account information and for video storing are situated in Ireland."

Risk: Irish hosting provides GDPR compliance advantages, but enterprises need guarantees that data won't cross borders or be accessible from other jurisdictions

Enterprise Issue:

• No data residency controls for specific jurisdictions
• No mention of government access restrictions
• Limited visibility into AWS sub-regions

Verdict: ✅ EU hosting helps compliance

🧠  2. AI Model Use

Risk: Complete silence on AI processing is a major red flag for enterprises handling sensitive data - they need to know if conversations are being used for model training or sent to third-party AI providers

Enterprise Issue:

• No disclosure of AI model providers
• No opt-out from AI training
• No bring-your-own-model options

Verdict: ⚠️ Zero details on AI processing

📊  3. Data Minimization

Quote: "Our business model is to provide a paid service to users who need to record, index and store meeting recordings, and does not rely on widespread collection of general user data."

Risk: While they claim minimal collection, the actual list includes IP addresses, device fingerprinting, location data, and extensive analytics - this creates unnecessary privacy surface area

Enterprise Issue:

• Collects device identifiers and crash data
• Tracks geographical location
• Extensive usage pattern analysis

Verdict: ⚠️ Collects extensive metadata

⚙️  4. Privacy Controls

Quote: "You can delete single recordings at any time via our web interface. If you delete your account, your information and content will be unrecoverable after that time."

Risk: Individual controls are insufficient for enterprise deployment - companies need admin-level controls to enforce privacy policies across all users and ensure compliance

Enterprise Issue:

• No workspace-level privacy controls
• No admin override capabilities
• Individual consent model doesn't scale

Verdict: ⚠️ Basic individual controls, no enterprise admin

📦  5. Compliance & Auditability

Quote: "AWS data centers are certified as ISO 27001, PCI DSS Service Provider Level 1, and/or SOC 1 and 2 compliant."

Risk: Infrastructure certifications don't extend to the application layer - enterprises need MeetGeek's own SOC 2 Type II, and for regulated industries, HIPAA compliance is essential

Enterprise Issue:

• No company-level SOC 2 Type II certification
• No HIPAA compliance mentioned
• No audit trail capabilities described

Verdict: ⚠️ Basic security certifications only

📬  6. Consent Handling

Quote: "As you are using Meetgeek to record meetings, you are responsible for collecting consents from all participants in the meeting prior to starting the recording."

Risk: This approach creates significant legal liability for enterprises - they become solely responsible for consent management without built-in compliance tools

Enterprise Issue:

• No automated consent workflows
• Complete liability shift to customer
• No consent documentation or audit trails

Verdict: ❌ Shifts legal burden to users

🔍  7. Model Explainability

Risk: For sensitive business discussions, enterprises need to understand what AI is extracting, how it's being processed, and have audit trails of AI-generated insights

Enterprise Issue:

• No AI processing logs
• No explainability features
• No audit trail of AI operations

Verdict: ❌ Complete AI transparency gap

🧼  8. Data Retention & Deletion

Quote: "The period or retention for customer data is defined as per the relevant subscription plan and is automatically handled by the respective policy."

Risk: Enterprises need specific retention periods and controls to meet compliance requirements - vague subscription-based policies don't provide sufficient certainty

Enterprise Issue:

• No specific retention periods disclosed
• No configurable retention policies
• Unclear post-termination data handling

Verdict: ⚠️ Vague retention policies

🤝  9. Third-Party Sharing

Quote: "We will not sell collected data to other companies. Information might only be delivered to necessary providers to fulfil our service agreement with you."

Risk: While the no-selling commitment is good, enterprises need detailed subprocessor lists and data processing agreements with all third parties

Enterprise Issue:

• No detailed subprocessor list
• Vague 'data protection standards' requirement
• No data processing agreement transparency

Verdict: ✅ Clear no-selling policy with reasonable sharing limits

✅ What MeetGeek Does Right (Credit Where It's Due)

• EU data hosting for GDPR compliance
• Clear no-data-selling policy
• Claims not to access recordings without permission
• Provides individual deletion controls
• Uses encrypted connections and AWS security infrastructure

Disclaimer: This evaluation is based solely on publicly available information and documentation. For formal enterprise vetting, always request a vendor's latest DPA, security whitepaper, and third-party audit reports.