Do they own your data? Sembly AI Privacy Policy Reviewed.
Sembly AI falls short of enterprise standards with a concerning 0/10 readiness score. Our comprehensive review exposes significant deficiencies in security protocols, compliance frameworks, and scalability requirements that make it unsuitable for enterprise deployment.
Final Enterprise Readiness Rating: 0/10
🧨 Not enterprise-ready (Reviewed 2026).
|
Area |
Verdict |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
|
Data Residency & Storage |
❌ High Risk |
No information available about data storage locations, residency requirements, or infrastructure controls |
|
AI Model Use |
❌ High Risk |
No information about which AI models are used, whether data trains models, or model deployment options |
|
Data Minimization |
❌ High Risk |
No information about what data is collected, how it's processed, or minimization practices |
|
Privacy Controls |
❌ High Risk |
No information about user controls, admin settings, or privacy configuration options |
|
Compliance & Auditability |
❌ High Risk |
No certifications, compliance frameworks, or audit capabilities mentioned |
|
Consent Handling |
❌ High Risk |
No information about consent workflows, recording notifications, or legal safeguards for meeting participants |
|
Model Explainability |
❌ High Risk |
No information about AI decision-making, logging, or observability features |
|
Data Retention & Deletion |
❌ High Risk |
No information about data retention periods, deletion policies, or post-termination data handling |
|
Third-Party Sharing |
❌ High Risk |
No information about subprocessors, data sharing, or third-party integrations |
👎 Recommendation for Enterprises:
Do not adopt Sembly AI in its current form if you handle:
- Confidential client communications
- Health, financial, legal, or regulated data
- Sensitive IP or trade secrets
- Any business-critical information
Instead, consider AI tools that:
- Publish comprehensive privacy policy
- Provide SOC 2 Type II certification
- Offer enterprise data residency options
- Implement granular privacy controls
- Support BYOM deployment
- Provide detailed subprocessor lists
Better Alternative:
✅ BuildBetter.ai — GDPR, SOC 2 Type 2, and HIPAA compliant
✅ Zero training on customer data
✅ You own your data. Fully opt-in privacy model.
🔍 Sembly AI Privacy Policy – Enterprise Risk Assessment
Audience: Security-conscious enterprise organizations evaluating AI meeting assistant for notes, action items, and insights for internal use in highly sensitive or regulated environments (e.g. legal, healthcare, finance, tech/IP-heavy orgs).
⚠️ Where Sembly AI Falls Short – Critical Gaps
🔒 1. Data Residency & Storage
Risk: Enterprises handling sensitive data must know where their data is stored and processed. Without this basic transparency, legal compliance and risk assessment are impossible.
Enterprise Issue:
- Unknown data residency
- No infrastructure transparency
- Cannot verify jurisdiction compliance
Verdict: ❌ Complete transparency failure
🧠 2. AI Model Use
Risk: For regulated industries, understanding AI model architecture, training data use, and deployment options is critical for risk management and compliance audits.
Enterprise Issue:
- Unknown model providers
- No training data controls
- No BYOM options disclosed
Verdict: ❌ Zero AI governance visibility
📊 3. Data Minimization
Risk: GDPR and privacy regulations require clear disclosure of data collection practices. Enterprises need this information to conduct privacy impact assessments.
Enterprise Issue:
- Unknown data collection scope
- No minimization controls
- Cannot assess regulatory compliance
Verdict: ❌ No data collection transparency
⚙️ 4. Privacy Controls
Risk: Enterprise deployments require granular privacy controls and administrative oversight. Without documented controls, compliance and governance are unmanageable.
Enterprise Issue:
- No admin controls
- Unknown opt-in/opt-out mechanisms
- No workspace-level privacy settings
Verdict: ❌ No privacy controls documented
📦 5. Compliance & Auditability
Risk: Regulated industries require SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR compliance documentation. Without these certifications, the tool is unusable for most enterprise contexts.
Enterprise Issue:
- No compliance certifications
- No audit trails
- Cannot verify security controls
Verdict: ❌ Zero compliance documentation
📬 6. Consent Handling
Risk: Meeting recording and AI processing require robust consent mechanisms to avoid legal liability, especially for client communications and regulated interactions.
Enterprise Issue:
- No consent workflows
- Unknown recording notifications
- Legal compliance unclear
Verdict: ❌ No consent management disclosed
🔍 7. Model Explainability
Risk: Enterprise AI governance requires understanding how AI systems make decisions, especially for business-critical meeting insights and action items.
Enterprise Issue:
- No AI transparency
- Unknown logging capabilities
- Cannot verify AI decisions
Verdict: ❌ Zero AI transparency
🧼 8. Data Retention & Deletion
Risk: Data retention policies are critical for regulatory compliance and reducing exposure. Enterprises need clear, configurable retention and deletion controls.
Enterprise Issue:
- Unknown retention periods
- No deletion guarantees
- Post-termination data handling unclear
Verdict: ❌ No data lifecycle management
🤝 9. Third-Party Sharing
Risk: Enterprises must understand all parties with access to their data for vendor risk management and compliance reporting. This transparency is completely absent.
Enterprise Issue:
- Unknown subprocessors
- No data sharing disclosure
- Third-party risk unassessable
Verdict: ❌ Third-party practices unknown
✅ What Sembly AI Does Right (Credit Where It's Due)
- Website indicates enterprise tier availability
- Multiple integration options suggested
- Industry-specific use cases documented
Disclaimer: This evaluation is based solely on publicly available information and documentation. For formal enterprise vetting, always request a vendor's latest DPA, security whitepaper, and third-party audit reports.